Module Six Blog Responses

Classmates to whom I have responded for Module Six:

1. Alexandra Salas at http://edutechtalk.blogspot.com/

2. Lou Morris at http://educ7015.blogspot.com/

3. Keith Klein at http://kklein66.wordpress.com/2011/08/21/module-6-learning-in-a-digital-world/

4. Claude Chavis at http://ndnweb.wordpress.com/

5. Michael Kirsch at http://edtheory7105.blogspot.com/

Personal Persective on Learning and Instruction

Technology is having a tremendous impact on the way our students learn and how we
teach in the traditional and (especially, since it is derived from technology) the distance learning setting. In traditional environment, the students meet with the instructor f2f at a specific time in a specific place to accomplish a specific set of tasks. These tasks may take on an extended persona by becoming homework or by being initiated during one meeting and finished during another. Materials for the class are usually contained within the classroom setting and students have access to them only when attending the class. Learning is subject to the knowledge of the instructor and often lacking in depth and points of interest. The online environment is not limited to specific times or places. The instruction is at a comfortable pace for the learner because the learner participates in a self-tutorial, pursuing information that seems appropriate to the requirements as presented by the instructor (Selim, 2007). The material presented in the class is of a nature that prompts inquiry and investigation on the part of the student, meaning that the class is definitely student (rather than instructor) oriented. The learning becomes more meaningful because it is more relevant to the discoveries and interests of the learner. Time and venue take on new dimensions with online learning in that limitations for both are greatly reduced. One may study, research, and prepare materials whenever individual learning styles find it most convenient. The only timeline that must be rigorously observed is the due date, which often may be amended due to difficulties with the technology (European Commission, 2010) (Babb, 2011).

As with so many other factors that are critical to positive human development, certain elements in learning and instruction are necessary and often similar, if not identical. There must be a safe, comfortable, positive environment in which teaching and learning take place. The material to be presented must be pertinent, relevant, and interesting to learners, while familiar and thoroughly understood by instructors. It is of tremendous value for the instructor to be forthcoming, honest, and genuine with students. Of equal importance is the truthfulness that students reflect toward instructors concerning levels of understanding, acquired skills, and areas of interest for future exploration. In both instances, there must be elements of trust and respect that form a foundation for learning to occur. My personal theory of learning concerns a consuming curiosity

lending itself to discovery learning. Originated by Jerome Bruner, Discovery Learning is inquiry-based instruction that is considered a constructivist theory. Learners incorporate past experiences and already acquired knowledge to help fit new information into new understandings about the world around them. With this method, truthfulness and trust are key concepts to presenting and learning new information (Learning Theories, 2011).

References:

Babb, D. (2011). Online Learning – Critical success factors. Online Education with a Personal Touch. California Southern University. Retrieved from http://www.calsouthern.edu/content/articles/online-professors-guide-to-higher-education/online-learning-critical-success-factors/.

European Commission Directorate-General for Education and Culture (19-21 May 2010). Peer Learning Seminar: Critical Factors for the Implementation of Lifelong Learning Strategies and Policies. Retrieved from http://www.kslll.net/Documents/Summary%20report%20-%20seminar%20critical%20factors%20for%20LLL%20implementation.pdf

Learning Theories (2011). Discovery learning (Bruner). Knowledge Base and Webliography. Rtrieved from http://www.learning-theories.com/discovery-learning-bruner.html.

Selim, H. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education 49, pp396-413. Retrieved from http://www.qou.edu/arabic/researchProgram/eLearningResearchs/criticalSuccess.pdf.

Blog Responses for Module 5

Classmate Blogs responded to for Module 5:

Toney Toni - http://toneyt.blogspot.com/

Sara Becker - http://edtechblogwaldenu.blogspot.com/

Lou Morris - http://educ7015.blogspot.com/

Technology Giveth, and Technology Taketh Away!

One of the most disappointing episodes in my teaching career occurred about twelve years ago when my school established a school-within-a-school scenario. The newer model was a technology academy that attracted middle school students from all over the district. With this innovation came the development that all instructors had to be technology proficient to facilitate optimum student learning with the equipment that would be present in each classroom. One of my partners, a very capable history teacher, decided that she was ill-equipped for the incorporation of technology into her regular classroom routine. After a very tough school year, she decided that an early retirement was her best option. She made this decision despite my best efforts to familiarize her with the Internet, word processing, and email. The district lost a fantastic educator and we lost a very productive and personable work mate who regularly made a very real difference in the education of our students.

Without realizing it, I was actually using elements of Keller’s ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction) model of motivational design may have made a difference in the decision made by my friend. I did appeal to her sense of exploration in expanding her own abilities in order to help her students. We all tried to build her confidence in using the technology through active participation, but soon discovered that without someone sitting next to her and coaching her through the steps, these actions were useless. When asked about her lack of utilization of the technology in her room, her response was that she had been teaching for many years and was too far along in her career to learn new methods now, especially those involving something as alien as computers. Hearing this, I dwelt on the relevance of the Internet in making history more exciting and real for her students. She agreed that the tools were formidable and would probably make a real difference, but in the classrooms of others and not her own. I often wonder how many other educators have removed themselves from teaching because of some development in classroom methodology that seemed unattainable to them. It seems a great waste to have these educators no longer making positive contributions to the lives of our students.

References:

Instructional Endeavors (2011). Keller’s arcs model. Retrieved from http://www.indeavors.com/resources/arcsmodel.htm

Keller, J (2008). Keller’s arcs model of motivational design. Retrieved from http://www.arcsmodel.com/

Learning-Theroies.com (2008). Arcs model of motivational design (Keller). Retrieved from http://www.learning-theories.com/kellers-arcs-model-of-motivational-design.html

Module Four Blog Responses

Blog responses made to classmates for Module Four:

Lou Morris - http://educ7015.blogspot.com
Sara Becker - http://edtechblogwaldenu.blogspot.com
Alexandra Salas - http://edutechtalk.blogspot.com
Deborah Forest - http://waldenforestintrospect.blogspot.com/

Learning with Mind Maps

Mind Map Reflection:

Early in my own learning experience, I remember being told that I was responsible for my own learning and no one was going to just give me the answers or allow me to slide on through. This seems like a very harsh thing to tell a five year old just starting the first grade, but it acts as a sign of the times. Learning was to be a singular endeavor that I could have assistance with, but had to accomplish on my own. Networking gives me a feeling of support and helps me focus on what I should be getting out of the instruction. It makes learning an event that is much more tolerable and valuable as a positive experience.

The tools that serve me best as facilitators of learning are the computer and the Smart phone (only because I can access the Internet with the Smart Phone). Other pieces of technology (television, radio, calculator, etc…) are also valuable as learning tools of specific types of information. The Internet is the most valuable tool in answering specific questions about disparate topics. Running a search using key

words with a search engine has become second nature. New information is learned by asking other individuals or running a computer search, dependent on the type of information required and the time frame within which it is required.



The mind map below is an example of what my information network may look like in graphic form. It is a very dynamic entity and shifts as the need for specific types of information changes. If you have difficulty reading the labels, please click on the image for a larger version.

References:

Bayne, G. (Producer). (2008, January 29). Connectivism [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/blog/gbayne/ELIPodcastConnectivism/167445

Chatti, M. & Jarke, M. (2007). The future of e-learning: A shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4/5), pp 404-420. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=connectivism+learning+as+network+creation&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

Kop, R. & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/523/1103%22

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. ASTD. Retrieved from http://www.astd.org/LC/2005/1105_seimens.htm

Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing Knowledge. Copyright 2006 by George Siemens. Used by permission.

Blog Contacts for Module 3

Class mates I have responded to for Module 3:

Kimberly Dean: http://educ7105kimberlydean.blogspot.com/
Alexandra Salas: http://edutechtalk.blogspot.com/
Toni Toney: http://toneyt.blogspot.com/
Deborah Forest: http://waldenforestintrospect.blogspot.com
Michael Kirsch: http://edtheory7105.blogspot.com/
Keith Klein: http://kklein66.wordpress.com/